Sunday, March 13, 2022

On Graphene.... 5G... The Future.....?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11 comments:

  1. Remember when the first info on the jab incorporating mRNA tech first came out and they said that mRNA WOULDN'T alter the DNA of the person who got jabbed? I guess that they forgot that the m stands for MESSENGER. What other purpose could mRNA have other than to alter the DNA of the receiving subject? It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that out. All you have to do is understand the meaning of messenger. In other words, an understanding of basic English.

    Then there's this: https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/adverse-reactions-to-covid-vaccines?s=r

    It's a rather long read, but it supposedly details the observations of an MD treating jabbed patients that developed adverse reactions after one, two and three jabs. Long story short ... I'm glad I'm pure blood.

    Nemo

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very briefly, messenger RNA carries a copy of a DNA sequence out of a cell nucleus (where all the DNA is) out to the molecular machinery out in the rest of the cell with the instructions on how to construct a given protein. It's the wrong direction to affect DNA.

      Messenger RNA

      Delete
    2. Except that there's an enzyme called reverse transcriptase that allows the transfer to go "backwards" - RNA to DNA. Discovered in the early 1970s, IIRC, and was linked to oncoviruses - that's right, viruses that cause cancer.

      There was a new report the other day that mRNA vaccines have been confirmed to affect the DNA of liver cells in vitro (tissue culture). “In this study we present evidence that COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 is able to enter the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro,” the researchers wrote in the study, published in Current Issues of Molecular Biology. “BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA as fast as 6 [hours] after BNT162b2 exposure.” Yes, I get this from a "popular press" source and not the journal directly.

      As with everything online, you're free to believe or not.

      Delete
  2. Strictly C T I’m not buying this at all. Worked in genetics labs for years.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Did he ever stop jabberring and get to some kind of point?

    ReplyDelete
  4. There's also a strong connection between this and the current push for neutering children. See this excellent presentation by James Corbett - https://odysee.com/qfc082-trans-humanism-720p:023ad9444484c1b2f66f841427e3b3dbb2ed601f

    ReplyDelete
  5. Boils down to this for me…

    I Do Not Trust ANYONE, Anymore… in Any Position of Power.
    Be it..media, LE, FED LE For Damn Sure, medical, political, technology, teaching, military, business, Humanitarian, the local church…

    They all just LIE LIE and LIE.
    This isn’t con-spiracy..This from there own Declass’D documents, FOIA, Journals,and the best one…just good ol’time.

    The last 13 yrs Have solidified that.
    The Deciet, Dis-info,Propaganda, this damn love for communism socialism amd Anarchy..has just gone WTF Off the charts.

    Time for another Good Solid Smiting or Flood, NOW.




    ReplyDelete
  6. I've actually worked with graphene. most of what this guy says graphene can do, it can't. it's single molecule thick carbon, not magical evil fairy dust. it's bad for your lungs. but other than that it's just carbon.

    most of the videos out there claiming to be graphene, are ferrofluids. very different stuff.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How can a sheet of graphite, one molecule thick, be stronger than steel? I'll concede the electrical properties, but a material like that would result in jumbo jets weighing 800 pounds. Climate problems solved.

      Delete
    2. it's stronger than steel, but only in a single plane...like it's impossible to stretch by pulling at the ends, but you can put your finger right through the flat side like tissue paper.

      of course, that's if they could make it in a large enough sheet. currently they can make what looks like flaked black paint, and that's about as big as they can make.

      when I worked with it we were trying to coat printed circuit boards in the stuff. they thought it might stop signal leakage..where the wires are so small, and so close together, that the signal can jump from one pathway to another. it never worked. they couldn't get the stuff to adhere reliably. the ones we did make usually were just a powdery mess, and you couldn't install them in anything.

      Delete

Leave us a comment if you like...