Yesterday I stopped by one of the local establishments I visit every so often. As usual the
conversation will be small talk and pleasantries and skirt around politics and current events.
As I was talking with the proprietor one other customer was discussing the Rittenhouse shootings
and trial. All agreed he acted in self defense. At that point, the politics got a little more in the
forefront of the conversation as everyone knew from that exchange we were all on the same page.
The owner then mentioned to me about the effbeeeye calling his establishment.
From there it was holy shit, no way, shocked face as the story was told.
It was some months back, the story started, the same customer was there and the same type of small
talk was going on. As usual it turns to light politics, blah blah blah......
There were some other customers present and one of
them spoke out and very specifically stated a serious threat to leader of the free world. He repeated it
and was getting to the point that the others were trying to diffuse the situation without causing
escalation.
Finally, the party left and things returned to normal.
The next day they received a call from the local effbeeeye inquiring about the situation.
A few days after that, the customer previously mentioned, not the threat maker, got a visit ,
at his home, by the SS. They had an image still from the security camera inside the business.
It was a picture of the guy that made the specific threats.
The SS asked if (customer) knew the person in the picture. Which he did not.
After this, (customer) inquires with owner to see if the owner gave out (customers) home address
and a copy of the picture from the camera. Owner stated that he didn't give out any info.
Now they start analyzing what must have happened to get them into this type of situation.
There were other customers present at the time. One of them, most likely, called in to report
the threat and passed on license plate info of cars present. Effbeeeye calls to interview,
meanwhile someone hacks into the security camera and gets a still image.
The owner doesn't even have a printer on site. He also noticed
that the *record sound* was turned on. From day one he had that off and had to toggle it off again.
It just goes to show that there are always *ears* and if they want to get into your system, they will.
There's another level of concern here that was missed. The owner kept the "record sound" off, yet the recording had sound. And the owner subsequently had to turn the "record sound" function back off.
ReplyDeleteThis was a setup. If the recording had no sound, it had no sound. That likely means the system was hacked prior to the event and the sound was turned on...prior to the event. Let the reasons for that scenario sink in.
Bingo. It seems to me the guy making the threats was the rat. Everyone else was in the crosshairs.
DeleteOccams Razor
DeleteIf this was a VCR CCTV system, then you would have to make a positive step to turn the sound on.
If it is a computer based CCTV systems, something as simple as an automated updated could have changed the setting or someone just screwing around, not knowing what they are doing.
Listen to Captain Chaos... These rat bastiges have been caught setting up their own investigations so many times, it's no wonder Hunter Biden laptop never got picked up!
DeleteWell it's getting to the point where you can't get six guys together to go to the range without one of them being a fibbee. He would be the clown the Tea Cups. I think this crap will increase as the mid terms grow closer. A good time to go Greyman.
ReplyDeleteFor what it is worth, I had the owner of a convenience store tell me that .gov subsidized most of the cost of the equipment and installation for his CCTV/security system. There was also a tax incentive offered. He did not go into detail, but I imagine by accepting such an agreement one also accepts the "terms and conditions" of that agreement (not to say the GESTAPO is concerned about legalities). I wouldn't be surprised if collected data was stored at regional fusion centers for a variety of reasons. In the last 25 years of so I've had a theory that tactics such as this coupled with facial recognition technology was one of the reasons fugitive criminals are caught so quickly clear across the country even after they have switched automobiles and ditched the cell phone. It is indeed a a great time to go "Gray Man".
DeleteDunkin Donuts was recording audio of everything that went on in their stores for years..probably still are...
DeleteAnyone who does not think the .gov has complete back door access to all digital comms and platforms including security equipment is seriously naive. Anything connected to the internet is capable of being hacked.
ReplyDeleteYou are 100% correct
Deleteand all of big tech is building it for them...
DeleteThey (.gov & big tech) are the real terrorists targeting the real patriots (you & me).
DeleteIt's going to get much, much worse.
the feds have spent a lot of our money to be able to back door their way into any computer. back in the 1980's had a officer who stated that the only "safe" computer was a stand alone OR unplug and in a box. I think they can even get in thru the power line these days. it also one of the reasons why they hate sownden so much, he let the cat out of the bag.
ReplyDeleteand some people still trust the gov't ? that I do not understand at all. expect this to get worse as more of the fusion centers come online. welcome to our new world !
So much for the Fourth Amendment protection of privacy in one's own establishment.
ReplyDeleteAre there any of the Bill of Rights that are still protected by the government, except for part of the 2nd? Many of them want to do away with that portion that we are still allowed to keep.
this link is to an excellent blog i go to daily. he frequently adds extra commentary about the biggest problem we face - surveillance. and he has made several stand alone posts about it. https://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/
ReplyDeleteI believe it was Samsung that came out with the voice activated television that was constantly listening and sending what it heard to the corporate computer farm. That was before Amazon decided everyone should have Alexa. Frankly, other than bandwidth issues, I wonder if Google phones are always listening in on people. Certainly the Google phone service is easedropping all of the time.
ReplyDeleteThe biggest invasion of privacy I heard of was the vibrator that phoned home with usage statistics.
My security systems are standalone, I DO NOT connect anything to the Internet that i don't want hacked.
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately, for Simplisafe to work I have to have Internet access, but i keep an eye on where the packets are going - not that a MIM attack can be done...
Not surprised at all after reading this. I was going to mention another great blog (AC’s) but Van beat me to it. The surveillance state is now on 1984 levels - something that maybe decade ago I would’ve dismissed as tinfoil hat schitzoid ramblings. After watching the last election stolen right in front of our eyes and the memory-hole campaign that followed all bets are off. Public privacy is an illusion.
ReplyDeleteFunny how you effectively mention constant surveillance but then mention the election being stolen. The only way for that to happen is for the surveillance state to be in on or at least approve of the stolen election. Kind of like when the FBI agents were following a know Islamic terrorist into a gun show, knowing he was intent on murdering Americans and then did absolutely nothing to stop it. It was violence they approved of (luckily a conceal carry citizen stopped the massacre).
DeleteWell, the voting machines were not supposed to be hooked up to the internet....yet they were. You don't think the NSA couldn't see that?
Deletehttps://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4jov9q
ReplyDeletelip reading is also an option that one must consider.
ReplyDeleteSo..what are you going to do about it?
ReplyDeleteTalk is cheap.
Seems like a real life example of Big Country's "C'mon....do domestic terrorism!" meme
ReplyDeletelike usual no one seems to know whom the (((real enemy))) are
ReplyDelete"Researchers at MIT, Microsoft, and Adobe have developed an algorithm that can reconstruct an audio signal by analyzing minute vibrations of objects depicted in video. In one set of experiments, they were able to recover intelligible speech from the vibrations of a potato-chip bag photographed from 15 feet away through soundproof glass."
ReplyDeleteAnd that was in 2014.
https://news.mit.edu/2014/algorithm-recovers-speech-from-vibrations-0804
And yet all the dipshits that put in the ring doorbell camera. I have a camera system. It is not connected to the internet. Most components of all systems are made in china so you know what that means. Dumb fucks trading their freedom for what they think is security. I hate those fucking ring doorbells and have read to much information about facial recognition as being still a predominate program especially with NSA. Edward Snowden did America a huge favor at great risk. Juliane Assange as well. Ever notice how no good American has stepped up since the Snowden incident. Fuckin unAmerican assholes.
ReplyDeleteWhenever this happens, always politely, but firmly say, "I want to help as much as possible. Please put your questions in writing and I'll go over them with my attorney and get back to you. Thank you". If you make a false statement in a case as outlined above, under US code title 18 section 1001, you can go to jail for 10 years. Most initial questioning by the SS is to try to trip you up. Once they do, it's, "ok we got you. Now tell us everything you know (or what the SS wants to hear) or it's off to a fed pen for you".
ReplyDeletehttps://www.wisenberglaw.com/articles/how-to-avoid-going-to-jail-under-18-u-s-c-section-1001-for-lying-to-government-agents/
ReplyDelete