I like this live version from 2006 Denmark even more: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2mw3c5 I've heard the song about 50 times and still don't know what it's about.
That song is largely an organ piece - or at least that's what the organist Matthew Fisher and a judge say. In 2009 Fisher sued for a piece of the royalties for the song and won.
That song is largely an organ piece - or at least that's what the organist Matthew Fisher and a judge say. In 2009 Fisher sued for a piece of the royalties for the song and won.
I like this live version from 2006 Denmark even more:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2mw3c5
I've heard the song about 50 times and still don't know what it's about.
Thanks for stopping by Dr. Parker,
ReplyDeleteI just found this explanation from Keith Reid the lyricist.
http://www.procolharum.com/awsop_lawsuit-58-uncut_krkr.htm
It seems there are a lot of different views of what the song is about but that is straight from the guy that wrote it.
That song is largely an organ piece - or at least that's what the organist Matthew Fisher and a judge say. In 2009 Fisher sued for a piece of the royalties for the song and won.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/music/music-news/5941449/Procul-Harum-organist-Matthew-Fisher-wins-share-of-A-Whiter-Shade-of-Pale-royalties.html
That song is largely an organ piece - or at least that's what the organist Matthew Fisher and a judge say. In 2009 Fisher sued for a piece of the royalties for the song and won.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/music/music-news/5941449/Procul-Harum-organist-Matthew-Fisher-wins-share-of-A-Whiter-Shade-of-Pale-royalties.html