This AI Stuff Is Exponentially Getting Better And Better... What is real and what isn't????
The video is digitally altered to show Ukrainian high-jumper Yuliya Levchenko, who is naturally beautiful, with a makeup face filter on. The original video can be found below:
Your likes/dislikes are more a product of the color of the skin of the woman who gave birth to you and gave you love than anything else. Evolution/survival instincts would make that most appropriate. Also consider the women that were around and supportive of her that you saw, who also showed you love as a child (think grandma too maybe or aunts, her girlfriends, etc.). That imprinting is important and impacts you forever. Oh, and I fully agree (though there is a lot to be said for Asian mixes with the French especially - just saying - but of course it is the familiar European features that I find attractive).
I’ve seen some AI pictures beautiful enough that I don’t care she isn’t a real person. I’ve also seen a lot of AI pictures that are an amalgamation of various facial features that the algorithm must have noted as attractive. The resulting composite is indeed attractive, but far from beautiful. In this case, the filter is pretty, but so obviously artificial that I don’t think it’s an improvement.
Unless it’s a photo competition, I really don’t care if I’m looking at a photograph, a painting, or an AI image. At my level, they’re all pixels.
I think I like the Unadorned version best.
ReplyDeleteBut that's just me....
Amen. Natural beauty on a woman is the best. Can not improve on God's given beauty. Exactly why I married my wife. BobT
DeleteYuo
DeleteEver notice how it is always whites who are objectively more beautiful that the other flavours?
ReplyDeleteYour likes/dislikes are more a product of the color of the skin of the woman who gave birth to you and gave you love than anything else. Evolution/survival instincts would make that most appropriate. Also consider the women that were around and supportive of her that you saw, who also showed you love as a child (think grandma too maybe or aunts, her girlfriends, etc.). That imprinting is important and impacts you forever. Oh, and I fully agree (though there is a lot to be said for Asian mixes with the French especially - just saying - but of course it is the familiar European features that I find attractive).
DeleteLegs goes on forever!
ReplyDeleteBELIEVE NOTHING ANYMORE.
ReplyDeleteAI dint do her justice. A hell of a lot prettier in real life all sweaty and shit!
ReplyDeleteJust thinking, does AI make her look bad on purpose this time around?
Deletedoes nancy pelosi know about this face filter thing?
ReplyDeleteYou have featured her in FFFF before
ReplyDeleteI remember when Fosbury invented it and dominated for a short period
DeleteShe's 5'10" and mostly legs. Stunning. - Nemo
ReplyDeleteNeeds some meat on those bones.
ReplyDeleteJust wait 25 years
DeleteI’ve seen some AI pictures beautiful enough that I don’t care she isn’t a real person. I’ve also seen a lot of AI pictures that are an amalgamation of various facial features that the algorithm must have noted as attractive. The resulting composite is indeed attractive, but far from beautiful. In this case, the filter is pretty, but so obviously artificial that I don’t think it’s an improvement.
ReplyDeleteUnless it’s a photo competition, I really don’t care if I’m looking at a photograph, a painting, or an AI image. At my level, they’re all pixels.
What a beautiful woman and one who does not need enhancements.
ReplyDeleteThe eyes of the AI version are "off" when it blinks.
First thing I noticed.
DeleteLooks like plastic.
ReplyDeleteIs her nether region also similar to a Barbie/Ken doll?
CC