Header image link

Link >>>>>>

Tuesday, April 20, 2021

Oh Boy, Looks Like There Was Another One Under The Bridge...

 

  From a comment on the woke white girl blocking traffic video:

 Anonymous writes,

 "What I find ironic is you post this to show how idiotic the protester is, which is true, while the Black cop speaks to her about America not having a race problem but a sin problem, which is also true. so if you agree with the Black cop why do you post pornography on your website? What you do not seem to "get" is like the protester you are also part of The U.S. sin problem, in other words, you offer no better alternative than the protester! So once again, if you attempting to publish the "virtue" of your conservative views on this website, you have failed! Instead what you do is you validate uber liberal biases against conservatives, that conservatives are just hypocrites, wanting to impose a morality on others that they themselves cannot or will not require of themselves!" 

 

  "What I find ironic is you post this to show how idiotic the protester is, which is true, "

( Ok we agree so far) 

" while the Black cop speaks to her about America not having a race problem but a sin problem, which is also true."

( No, America does not have a "sin" problem, America has a Progressive Democrat Libtard problem. They have taken away the Pledge of Allegiance, removed the word God and pushed religion aside. They have pushed abnormalism as mainstream and continuously work to collapse the American way of life. They have ruined many a black family in the cities they run and with the help of the media have tried to push aside more than half of the country. Lot's more I ain't got time. )

 So, if you agree with the Black cop...  ( At what instant did you see or infer that I agreed with the law officer? I would buy him a beer for putting up with her shit when he just should have told her to get out of the road or she would be arrested. Like they would do to Trump supporters AND that is where I don't support law officers when they stand down for the leftist protestors that libtard mayors allow to cause distruction with no accountability. As far as that one cop, I can support him for his patience in dealing with her. His religious beliefs didn't even register that much to me.)

... why do you post pornography on your website?  ( Hold on, I'll be right back. I need to get some devil's water.)   *jeopardy music*

( Ok, let's start with the dictionary. Pornography , noun,  
printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity, intended to stimulate erotic rather than aesthetic or emotional feelings.

Well now, does anyone remember ever seeing sexual organs or activity on this blog? Anyone? Anyone?Bueller?  Now if you are referring to breasts as sexual organs then that may be your issue. I enjoy sharing God's most amazing creation. If someone wants to rub one out in the privacy of their home, I'm fine with that as well. < See, that's my liberal side.

 Come to think of it, Eve fucked up and ate the apple offered by the snake. Before that they were naked and innocent. I think the dinosaurs were around then but they fell off the edge of the flat earth. We can save those stories for another time. Anyway, how is it a sin to enjoy the warm soft silky view of a woman's naked body. Each one different in their own way, unless they get mad at you, then they are all the same.) ( just kidding ladies, you are all beautiful even when you want to kill us)

 What you do not seem to "get" is like the protester you are also part of The U.S. sin problem, in other words, you offer no better alternative than the protester! (Ok, a little debauchery never hurt anyone. I didn't realize posting some tits and ass, that God created, was causing sin and ruining the US?  How about murdering someone for a pair of fucking sneakers or maybe burning down someone's business because you were told to "fight in the street" by a Democrat congress-woman. How about the mules that bring innocent woman and child across the border as sex slaves? The government is allowing that under Harris Biden and no one gives a shit. You want pornography? Go watch some of First son Hunter Biden's home clips of family fucking and drug snorting.)

So once again, if you attempting to publish the "virtue" of your conservative views on this website, you have failed!  ( Have you read this blog? Jesus Christ, forgive me father I have sinned, at what point did I EVER publish my "virtue" as a conservative? For the record, I'm an independent that leans to the right. I think most liberals suck and I think RINO's suck even more. Mitt Romney comes to mind. The government is corrupted, both sides are bought off and we are either at war with Eastasia or Westasia depending on what week it is. I may not have high moral standards BUT I do have high standards that I use to discern which lovely, voluptuous , sensual creatures get posted on Friday night. I also will add the sin of gluttony by posting the food and alcohol pictures. It's kinda like a picture orgy of over indulgence. God, I'm goin' to hell.)

 

 Instead what you do is you validate uber liberal biases against conservatives, that conservatives are just hypocrites, wanting to impose a morality on others that they themselves cannot or will not require of themselves!" 

(So, let me try and understand this,  conservatives are hypocrits and want to impose morality and by me posting nudies and running a "conservative" blog this validates the uber liberal bias? Well now, color me shocked!  Maybe I should change the name of this blog to "Irish's Little House On The Prairie".

 If I don't post nude chicks anymore and minimize publishing the "virtue" of my conservative blog then the uber liberal bias will be unvalidated and will go away and we can all sing kumbaya? 

I think I remember the scene where the Priest gets out of the bunker and walks toward the martian invaders. Religion didn't protect him and I'm sure taking the moral high road and being all virtuous will not protect me from the uber liberals. I'll take my immoral chances and enjoy some boobs) 

Thanks for stopping by and commenting!












 

36 comments:

  1. You are amazing. Boobs are beautiful not pornography. We have to settle our societal differences and soon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Some boobs are beautiful. Trust me on that one.

      Delete
  2. Here's the real irony here. This Mr or Ms Anonymous finds fault with multiple articles posted by the site's owner like his or her sophomoric opinions are going to change the content on this site.

    Yet Mr. Anonymous KEEPS COMING BACK to be subjected to ridicule by the sites owner and scorn from other posters.

    Anonymous, thy real vainglorious name is Stupidity.

    Nemo

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Yet Mr. Anonymous KEEPS COMING BACK to be subjected to ridicule by the sites owner and scorn from other posters."

      It's the pornography.

      Delete
  3. Irish, that’s hilarious! Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I wonder if Anon realized . . . there are other sites on the Internet?

    Nah. It's not a Mr. Anon. It's Karen. She just can't find your manager.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Like Phil so eloquently said to his most recent troll:
    Don't like the page? There is a red "X" up in the corner. Feel free to click it and not come back.

    Trust me. We won't miss you.

    Leigh
    Whitehall, NY

    ReplyDelete
  6. It was like I was watching and listening to myself talking in a mirror while reading this post. Unfortunately, if there is one thing I have learned from multiple futile lessons in my old age, its that trying to explain Conservatism (or just plain old common sense) to a Liberal is fucking impossible. Better to just have another glass of good whiskey or go look at some beautiful breasts.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I attended Bible college for just one year back when I believe the dinosaurs might just have been walking the earth, but I was too busy. I have pointed out to many of the prudish people who like to say that looking at beautiful women is sin, is that sex was introduced into the Garden of Eden well before Adam and Eve sinned, and were kicked out of the Garden. There is absolutely nothing sinful out of appreciating beauty in the female form, nor in the male form, for that matter. Sin enters into the equation when we begin thinking evil thoughts, which some of us are able to control, while still looking at beautiful women. I would no sooner have sex with anyone other than my wife than I would rob a bank or kill someone on the street for no reason other than to see if my gun was sighted in.
    But hey, anony, feel free to judge others, all you want. Let me know how that works out for you, both in the future, and even just now. Because now, I don't think anyone really gives a care what you think.

    ReplyDelete
  8. @ Anon

    In these latter days we are all thrust into the situation of, individually, a position we'd otherwise dare not take. And that position would be to have to judge our fellows, man and woman, man or woman.

    For we know Genesis 3:19.

    Asses 'n asses 'n mud 'n mud.

    Of course we prefer female type asses in these parts. Mud isn't discriminatory.

    Your mileage Anon may vary so of course you are free to roam your own path.

    If it's an 'otherwise path' you're on - Good Luck. (Get mad a'cause being a girlfriend's girlfriend's boyfriend's kid you had to sometimes run out in the street and holler for somebody to call 911 and nobody had a charged up cellphone? Well that happens sometimes.)

    Isn't there Anon a busy street nearby that you can go out in play in?

    JK/AR

    ReplyDelete
  9. Don't ya love the fair weather virtuous religious types. I don't subscribe to the invisible sky creature beliefs snd never will.
    I would suggest an extra special "sin Friday" this week though. Want contributions? Just say the word.😊

    ReplyDelete
  10. What is seen on your blog is no more pornography than a Rubens or Degas. You can see similar images in every art museum in the country. You can see much more explicit images in any museum of modern art. You post beauty, not pornography. As has been said "I can't define pornography but I know it when I see it." I've never seen it here.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Brewvet you said it Better than I could.

      Irish continue to post Beauty here. Even the Sandwiches are Art!

      Delete
  11. Irish, keep up the good work. We all know that wacky anon is just one of the many brainless sheep doing the work of the left. That is, they continue to throw things at the wall and hope something sticks. They faithfully watch/read CNN and DumbassNBC for their talking points because they are no longer in college where they can get it from their teachers. I really enjoy your lighthearted banter with this one. As we are on the outside of their liberal bubble, we can see the ridiculousness and laugh. They, sadly for the US and the world, cannot. Almost makes you feel sorry for them that they want so badly to be intellectually superior but cannot see beyond the facade.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well said Bob. I for one do not feel sorry for them. Stupid is supposed to hurt and it eventually does sometimes sooner than later. They chose their path now they have to walk it. Thank you Irish

      Delete
  12. There's always some moronic bible-thumping prude out there trying to ruin everything for everyone else. They really don't like anyone enjoying life differently than they do. This species knows no political preference ... they live on both the Left and the Right.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hey if I don't sin Jesus is out of a job. Yeah, your welcome....

    ReplyDelete
  14. They are probably located somewhere deep in Canada and there you have it.

    ReplyDelete
  15. She needs to buy a lottery ticket. What are the odds that, by chance, when typing out it's Wokie-Pokie manifesto, the exact letters needed to reach your site were mysteriously entered in its browser AND the ENTER key was pressed. Fucking trolls - I swear!

    ReplyDelete
  16. So anyone can complain about how the blog is managed?

    Excellent, I will submit a complaint.

    There are not enough pictures in FFF of women with small boobs. Not that there is anything wrong with large boobs, of course, but there should be equal viewing opportunity for all sizes (mostly) of boobs.

    chuckling

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. With you on that.

      "Anything larger than will fit in a champagne glass is wastage" as my ol' 9th grade Science teacher used ta say. PBUH.

      Of course there is the adage, 'waste not want not' so where there's maybe an overabundance I reckon the best course is to always pickle it for a rainy day.

      JK/AR

      Delete
  17. Did that fuckers' parents have any kids that lived and WASN'T retarded?

    ReplyDelete
  18. As Charlie Brown would say, "Good grief!" Ohio Guy

    ReplyDelete
  19. I teach at a small college. I am a beat up old fat man, and quite well aware of my limitations. One of the great perks of this profession is that I get to look at pretty 18 to 22 year-old-women every class day. I don't leer at them, I don't find an excuse to "just brush up against them by accident," their appearance does not figure in the grade I put on their papers, and I am sure as Hell not about to try to develop anything other than a professional relationship with them (that is both a great way to to poison a class and to get your ass fired).

    But they sure are nice to look at. Yep. You caught me. I am a heterosexual. In fact, I am a flaming heterosexual.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I believe the term they're using these days is "superstraight"

      https://notthebee.com/article/the-political-right-is-starting-to-use-lefties-idiotic-language-against-them-and-its-beautiful

      Delete
  20. I am going to work "See, that's my liberal side" into as many conversations as I can today!!

    ReplyDelete
  21. ...and I repeat...Bwaaahahaahahahahaahahaha!!
    More popcorn, Irish! MOAR POPCORN!!

    ReplyDelete
  22. Off topic. I am SO tired of pro Climate change and Covid19 vaxx propaganda.'Another OH guy

    ReplyDelete
  23. Bravo Zulu, Irish!
    --Tennessee Budd

    ReplyDelete
  24. Fred in AccountingApril 22, 2021 at 12:29 AM

    Being mostly a non-agressive chap, I'll give Anon the benefit of the doubt and suggest he/she/it might be romantically attached to the white girl shouting "racism" out in the middle of the street and is merely standing up for the virtue of his/her/its 'partner'. In another vein, Anon, why don't you go crawl into the nearest manhole and not show your face again? I still remember the first time I heard my teenage daughter call someone "jackass"; how appropriate in this instance. All pretty tame as far as telling you to get lost and fuck yourself with a corkscrew while you are at it.

    ReplyDelete
  25. I have a somewhat different perspective on this, because I am the sort of extremely religious person that avoids viewing images of female beauty (through the use of image blocker software) for religious reasons.

    The thing is, that's my choice, and it doesn't affect anyone other than me. I don't tell anyone else how to live or what to believe. I think the person who left that comment is wrong and that Irish is right.

    And yeah, I personally avoid viewing the Friday posts. But mostly because the food images make me feel gluttonous, the beverage images make me feel like boozing, and the classic cars make me feel envious.

    The difference between me and that liberal commenter is that I don't seek to criticize others for their choices, I only seek to restrain myself. Whereas that commenter somehow feels fit to judge others.

    ReplyDelete
  26. 1) Spot on response and fisking of Softy McEmptyhead's pointless points.
    2) If you were just sharpening your claws, I understand.
    3) Anyone who thinks FFF is "pornography" isn't old enough to be looking at anything on the internet. Or any other form of media, including radio, TV, books, magazines, or flyers at the laundromat. Period. FFS, the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue and Charlie's Angels - in the mid-1970s - not to mention feature films from the 1950s or even 1930s, pushed more scandalous material than anything you've ever posted here. Anybody carping about hypocrisy is about a red whisker from wanting women to wear hijabs and burkhas, or else neck to ankle floor-length flour sack dresses, with head coverings, like on an Amish farm, or medieval cloister, 24/7, and probably thinks women should be raped "because they were asking for it" by the way they were dressed. I dunno, maybe the guy's been living in a cave since 1880, and just woke up yesterday and logged on the 'net first thing. Or maybe he's just an @$$hole with a keyboard but no connection to his brain. I could give you odds on which is likelier.
    4) I long since found it far simpler to simply delete the occasional troll - at least after the second attempt to wrangle them back to topic and sanity - than to give them the negative attention they deserve, nine times out of ten. (Or is it eleven times out of ten? I forget...) It saves my blood pressure, and pisses them off more thoroughly than does a response they will neither read nor grasp. ZFG. Just saying.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Regarding your reply - Hell YES!!!

    ReplyDelete
  28. The Gods themselves...

    ReplyDelete
  29. I stop in every day to see what's new. The food pics scattered throughout the rest of the art makes FFF a lot of fun.

    Great response, Irish!

    ReplyDelete
  30. you'd think people would have enough of thier own problems to worry about.

    there is nothing wrong with looking at a pretty girl and being able to say she's pretty.

    I used to work as the doorman to a swingers club in portsmouth NH (it's long gone) and the people trying to shut us down the hardest were the ones that had the most messed up lives. it's as if they figured if they could "fix" us they could fix themselves.

    ReplyDelete

Leave us a comment if you like...