Header Image Map

Tuesday, November 29, 2022

Sea Ice... Confounds.

 

 

Dramatic Recovery in Global Sea Ice Confounds the Net Zero Catastrophists <<<<<<

 

"You Don't Say?"

 

 

 

17 comments:

  1. Come on, man. Everyone knows globull warming generates more ice. Follow the science!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Everyone knows that when the dinosaurs roamed the earth, the whole place had the same fauna as the Amazon rain forest (petrified remains of ferns were found in Canada's far north back in the late80s/early 90s). We also know that 10000-15000 years ago most of N. America (what is today Canada and most of the USA) as well as Europe almost down to Spain was covered in sheets of ice and snow over a mile thick. Then about 1000 years ago it got so warm that Vikings were able to literally row their open boats from Greenland (which had a thriving Viking colony for 500 years) to N. America (proof of a Viking way-station can be found in l'Anse aux Meadows, Newfoundland Canada)...So, what does this prove? That perhaps the temperature of this crazy old earth goes up and down like a sine wave over the millennia. What Mr Mann did with his "hockey stick" research was to discount the lows and merely recorded the highs--in the "bad" old days we would call that tampering with the facts--today the Left and the media call it "science."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. very nicely stated favill.

      I add that during the medieval warm period, temperatures were about 5+ degrees warmer than today. So warm that they were growing grapes in England, which they can't do today because it's too cold. I suppose it got so warm from all of the wood and coal they were burning to stay warm in winters that were far colder than today.(sarc)

      These "climate scientists" were caught red handed manipulating temperature data so that the models they used would generate the "right" data extrapolated out over 50-100 years.

      The models that they use are the same ones that they used for weather forecasting today which are only right about 70% of the time over a ten day period despite having some of the largest supercomputers crunching the data and we're supposed to believe that these same models can accurately predict what the climate will be like 50-100 years from now?

      The fact is the climate has been warming for the past 10,000-15,000 years due to sunspot cycles and varying heat output from our home star, the Sun, combined with variations in Earth's orbit around said star.

      Carbon dioxide, which comprises 0.04% of the atmosphere, read that again, 0.04% of the atmosphere or .004 of atmospheric gases is being blamed for the supposed rise in temperature outside of "normal" bounds. Total fucking bullshit.

      How is it that 50 years ago, the cover of Time magazine proclaimed that we're heading for a New Ice Age? Yet here we are now, 50 years later, being subjected to this crass craziness of glowbull warming.

      Did I tell you about this bridge I have for sale?

      Nemo

      Delete
  3. It wasn't even "research". Mr Hockey Stick just ran a computer program and out came a prediction. GIGO

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And it seems to produce the same curves no matter what data you enter.

      Delete
  4. here's three factors nobody talks about... the sun... it gets brighter, the earth warms up, it gets dimmer, the earth cools...
    earths orbit is not a perfect circle...earth gets closer to the sun, the earth warms up, further away it gets cooler.
    the earth wobbles. when the north pole leans in toward the sun, the north warms and loses ice, while the south cools and gains ice, and the opposite effect when the south is leaning in.
    nobody studies or talks about these effects much. why not?? easy.... man has nothing to do with these effects, and can do nothing to control mor change them, and, most importantly, no amount of taxation, mandating, or government control will change any of them in the slightest. there's no advancing an agenda with uncontrollable natural forces

    ReplyDelete
  5. So, how many more consecutive, hyped, failed, predictions of carbon doom do we have to endure before we can all face the fact that the climate is apparently just as cyclic as every single fuckin' paleoclimatology study worth its salt has shown it to be?

    Here's my prediction: More than you can shake a stick at, plus the stick.

    As long as .gov keeps wearing out shovels pitching cash at the global warming, or climate change/disruption/crisis, or AGW (whatever they're calling it this week) machine, it will continue. Everything .gov subsidizes, we get more of, especially if it's a "crisis". Poverty, racism, insane "green" anything, soybeans, expensive energy, shitty low-income housing, war, everything.

    And .gov is undeniably behind all this crap, your tax dollars at work.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Funny how this stuff keeps working out.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Camels roamed the USA.

    Bear Claw

    ReplyDelete
  8. ps To end the argument ask why the water line at the base of Ellis Island is the same.

    ReplyDelete
  9. The Cult of Climastrology has no idea why sea ice has returned. The highly massaged data prediction program can not account for reality. They are however more than confident they can change the weather for your benefit through proper taxation.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I work in the field. I have personally heard "scientists" request funding "to develop algorithms to make the data fit the model". They received it.

    ReplyDelete
  11. ...and I STILL heard on the "news" (or somesuch program) a few days ago that the coral reefs are still dwindling.
    Still shoveling that manure on us.

    ReplyDelete
  12. No matter what we do, the Earth will survive mankind. By a long time.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Yup. The climate change, global warming zipper heads running around like chicken little are probably part of the same crowd who were bleating about “peak oil”.

    Power, money, CONTROL. That’s all it’s about. Fekkin’ commies.

    Ragnar

    ReplyDelete
  14. Annnnnd the "experts" were wrong again. Keeping their perfect record intact. Oh, dont forget to send money to AlGore and Kerry.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Why is there no DATA on the effect of Cloud cover in ANY of the Studies research projects or report??????? Our own National oceanic and atmospheric Association. Was caught submitting "adjusted temperature data" showing that temperatures had gone up. When they were caught they removed the adjustments and surprise, surprise the temperature variations were in the normal range of variability. The sun cycles about every eleven years. The next maximum is from approximately late 2024 and it starts to decline about November 2026

    ReplyDelete

Leave us a comment if you like...