Thanks for sharing
In the recent Charlie Kirk post I had asked for links of videos mentioned in comments and a a couple posted these. I don't know what to believe in this age of AI (not saying either of these are "fakes"), but I do know there are several "inconsistencies" with the original/FBI story and the physical evidence.
Not enough damage for 30 06 at 200 yards. Elon Musk spoke to a reporter at the service and told what I believe to be the truth. “ they killed him for his words”
ReplyDeleteSteven Crowder on Rumble had a very complete rundown of the Facts, official statements, unknowns and conspiracy theories
ReplyDeletehttps://rumble.com/v6zb33g--charlie-kirk-conspiracies-and-more-uk-lunacy-your-monday-wrap-up.html?start=1881
This from the Effbeeeye:
ReplyDelete"We've researched the videos and determined they are all fake. Your lying eyes have convinced you there is more to it than we, the official experts, have told you. Please return to your places in line and do not continue to think for yourselves."
And we thought internet sleuthing was hard before...
ReplyDeleteTrust is gone, pretty much across all boards. How in ther hell are we ever going to rebuild that trust now with all this new shit?
That there is one big SHEESH
One issue I have is all this noise about no large exit wound. I don't believe the round stopped as some are saying, but no one has the autopsy photos anyway, but I've seen through and throughs from that caliber.
ReplyDelete