Wednesday, September 17, 2025

Earshot-The Charlie Kirk Murder

                           Forensics Tell The Story, Everything Else Is A White Rabbit Psy-Op


This is an interesting read I found following a link in a comment posted by Don't Mind Me (H/T)

George Webb makes a strong case that the headlines and the real story are two different animals. Read the entire article HERE.



43 comments:

  1. You have to be pretty fucking stupid to believe this horseshit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You sound like you're vaccinated.

      Delete
    2. Probably is!!!!! Get a 20 year term life insurance policy on his ass ...will pay off in your benefit within 10!!!! ,,,, maybe less!!
      skybill

      Delete
  2. I blog site called Outside the Overton is done by a retired American sniper. He goes through the sequence of screen shots and justified his proof that the bloody wound was an exit wound and the entry wound was on the right side of Charlie’s head below and to the rear of his ear. He shows what appears to be a muzzle flash. People have stated that his spinal cord was severed. That makes perfect sense based of the shot placement. The caliber and bullet path needs to be published by the corner. This will stop the conspiracy bs. Why was no attempt made to find the bullet since there was an exit wound? The popular opinion was that he was shot with a 30-06. The exit wound would have been on the rear of his neck and not the front. I think that maybe the rifle was a .17 HMR. No catastrophic wound to the entire area. Small entrance and a small by comparison exit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. makes sense, it would seem that a 30-06 would have decapitated the poor man.

      Delete
    2. It all depends on bullet construction. I’ve seen many a western rock chuck dispersed with many calibers. My experience is that a high speed 22 cal bullet virtually grenades a 10 to 12 pound rock chuck (depending on bullet weight and construction). A heavier caliber such as a 25 or 30 cal punches right through without a lot of damage. Not enough bone and muscle to expand the bullet. Similar to a human neck, probably punched through and didn’t really expand. Just an opinion, sounds like they didn’t recover the bullet so we will really never know.

      Delete
  3. Mr Kirk was killed by a professional sniper using sub-sonic rounds, shot from the front. Watch the vids again, his shirt jumps up on impact and the round fragments and deflects into his neck/jugular, one piece hits is spinal column, and 1 end up in his sinus. If you have every heart shot a deer, what does the deer do when you hit the chest....flinches up, just like Mr Kirk did....don't listen to these BS alternate shot theories....in fact go to SONAR21 site and read/view the article there...

    ReplyDelete
  4. At the risk of seeming decoupled from reality, the explanations from official sources and the actions of federals do not align with observable events. Maybe the explanations are accurate, but maybe not.
    I first doubted the .30-'06 angle when I heard the recording - the hit and report are too close for a 100+ yard shot and a .30-'06 sounds much different in my limited experience. When you begin the "Hey, waaaait a minute..." process the unravelling does not stop until you find the end of the string.
    I will not be surprised if the murder weapon is later described not as a Mauser but a mail-order Carcano with a shitty scope. Historical reference might require some research, but you'll see what I mean.
    And why why why was the murder scene not preserved? 'splain THAT one Patel.
    Lots of questions and none are being addressed by the BlueCoatFederals.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "the actions of the federals do not align with observable events"

      I agree with that statement.

      Delete
    2. The sound and the bullet would arrive at the same time, thus sounding "too close together".

      Delete
  5. draw the line from entry to exit and walk it back until steel meets a rooftop. That’s the shooter’s origin, no matter what the headlines scream..
    The obvious.
    And notice what they Didn't do was take the wound line,Trump's position on the platform and all the video and use That to show where the bullet came from. Forensics are Not being used in the Kirk murder. Why don't they have the bullet?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Perhaps the wrong rabbit hole- this analysis looks legit time will tell
    https://rense.com/?En

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. time will tell us that nothing makes sense anymore. things keep getting curious and curiouser

      Delete
    2. Time will tell us the same thing that 62 years worth of JFK info told us! We'll never know the real truth, we never have.

      Delete
  7. Within hours, most reliable source was told of the right ear shot. His sources are in a position to know.

    ReplyDelete
  8. If the evidence shows the bullet came from his right that changes everything. But the person telling this story could not resist sprinkling around numerous conspiracy theories to weave into it. This immediately made me think he is a wing nut and then doubt everything he said. For example what does Mena Arkansas have to do with the shooting of Kirk? Only in this man's mind. And with all his research and charts and videos not a single picture or video of the area he thinks the real shooter was standing. There are literally hundreds of videos, many online. But he has nothing to show that single most important part of his claim.

    ReplyDelete
  9. So, this guy is saying that Kirk was shot FROM BEHIND through the opaque screen that was behind him? Am I reading that correctly?

    Nemo

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thanks for posting.
    A lot of questions. The one that I can't wrap my head around is why the crime scene was literally dismantled while Kirks body was still warm.
    https://magaville.wordpress.com/2025/09/17/the-charlie-kirk-ambush/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. for the same reason world trade center was cleaned up in record time, to eliminate the possibility of collecting any forensic evidence that would question the official narrative. Of course, doing that just brings up more questions, right?

      Delete
    2. Did you not see the two planes fly into the two WTC buildings? Do you live in a cave???

      Delete
    3. I didn't see two planes fly into buildings, I was on an FTX on active duty, where I was hearing M-240Bs firing blanks.

      Those have the same sound signature of a mysterious gambler with a bump-stock and carbon-less powder overlooking a concert, but WTF does anyone know during this time of gaslighting writ large...

      Delete
  11. There is a video showing that the bullet came from the front, hit his bullet proof vest and bounced up into his neck. Because it was a ricochet the speed of the bullet was substantially less and was captured on video. This video disproves the claim that he was shot from his right side.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good thing video never lies, heard that from an Ewok.

      Delete
    2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltakvGyzfZs&rco=1

      Delete
    3. There is speculation that the man in the brown shirt (see the link) is the actual shooter.

      https://rense.com/?En

      Delete
    4. There is speculation that the man in the brown shirt near the front of the stage is the shooter.
      https://rense.com/?En

      Delete
  12. My unscientific 2 cent conspiracy theory (bash at will, won’t bother me). I thought early on that the rooftop “shooter” was firing a blank round (noisemaker) as a distraction so a well-timed suppressed round could be fired from close range. I think someone mentioned choreography somewhere. The timing needed to be nearly perfect.
    DGinFLA

    ReplyDelete
  13. Very interesting. I haven’t heard this yet. Something about all the shenanigans with the discord messaging seems to hint at a conspiracy. I hope the truth comes out.
    Ed

    ReplyDelete
  14. I'm trying not to get to far off in the weeds on the conspiracy theories. However I have big problems with where the scope
    was mounted on that gun. All the way back. Not optimal for a prone shooter. That didn't look like a subsonic round to me. I dunno.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The conspiracy theories are out thick as I'd expect. There are a lot of unanswered questions too. As for me, I'd like to know the truth as to how the scoped 30-.06 German Mauser conversion rifle gun got off the roof and into the woods wrapped in a towel. Another thing I was skeptical of was when security/police grabbed the older guy and placed him on all fours fairly close to where Kirk was sitting. The media kept stating that a suspect was in custody and it appeared he was in custody at that point . Maybe I've read to many spy stories, but I got the vibe right away that that was a diversion. What happened to that guy? It is like he vanished after being taken away. I still believe that was "fishy". Neither would it surprise me to learn .gov already has phone and/or internet evidence linking the confused-medicated-manifesto writing-killers in a larger conspiracy. Just sayin'

      Delete
    2. look at the rifle(prop) in the box again....look at the scope mounting and tell me if you would shot that rifle????

      Delete
    3. yes eye relief on that scope, would put the forehead of the person holding it presumably against his shoulder, WAY WAY back on the stock. The stock looks synthetic. Did someone take an antique mauser and greatly reduce its value by replacing the original wood stock with cheap plastic? Where did the nice corrugated box come from, numerous allegedly "official" reports and the transcript of the (concocted) text messages indicate the gun had been left in the woods wrapped in a towel?

      The whole story stinks.

      Go read the BCE poast, he was the first to notice the synthetic stock that I saw . . . .

      Delete
  15. Full metal jacket makes a small exit wound.
    Soft points or hollow points make big exit wounds.
    Maybe discussing the case is a commie attempt at guaranteeing no juror can reach an objective decision.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Conspiracy theorists gather faster than ambulance chasers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is a very good reason for that - they are usually the first ones with the real info (CV19 anyone?)

      Delete
    2. I heard that conspiracy theorists were the first real astronauts to land on the Moon!

      Delete
  17. When nobody knows what to believe our job is done. - some asshole from the CIA

    The word in fed circles is the FBI had almost immediate access to all security video in the area. Think about that and what Ed Snowden did.

    ReplyDelete
  18. According to this article, a "spinner gun" was used to shoot from the right. Do an internet search an you will find that twrm produces an image identical to the graphic in that added article. Problem is, rhe spinner gun is a toy, no such weapon exists.

    ReplyDelete
  19. So, not really sure if this thread is still active, but I'm reading today that they found the bullet. The coroner found it still lodged in Charlies neck. No fucking way. Kash Patel announced that they are pursing all theories surrounding Kirk's murder. It's not like I want to be a conspiracy theorists, they force us into it.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Just a wild, out there thought. 220 grain Lehigh 30 cal projectile, subsonic rapid expansion, 7.62x25 case, solenoid fired action. Tested and optimized custom loading in an integrally suppressed 1:8 twist barrel, maybe 10 inch length. Paired with a camera optic, and controlled through a smartshooter ballistic manager. Mounted on a FPV drone, with stabilization. Maybe at about 175 yds, it could maintain a 7 inch group size. Point of aim about an inch below the jugular notch, and your group size will be in a lethal effect area. Low observable, easy exfil, highly deniable, light windage stable. If the projectile keyholed, it wouldn't likely over penetrate.

    ReplyDelete

Leave us a comment if you like...