Well looky here:
Hockey Stick Broken! “Scientist” Michael Mann Loses in Court, Forced to Pay Court Costs — Global Warming Hoax Hit Hardest
Supreme Court of British Columbia dismisses Dr Michael Mann’s defamation lawsuit versus Canadian skeptic climatologist, Dr Tim Ball. Full legal costs are awarded to Dr Ball, the defendant in the case.
The Canadian court issued it’s final ruling in favor of the Dismissal motion that was filed in May 2019 by Dr Tim Ball’s libel lawyers.
The plaintiff Mann’s “hockey stick” graph, first published in 1998, was featured prominently in the U.N. 2001 climate report. The graph showed an “unprecedented” spike in global average temperature in the 20th Century after about 500 years of stability.
...and of course this will be covered extensively in the MSM, NOT!
ReplyDeleteNemo
Someone said years ago that if you feed random numbers into his equations, they generate a hockey stick pattern. Pure BS.
ReplyDeleteMann has been hiding his methods forever. What happened in this case is the judge finally said, "F*ck you, I'm not waiting another minute for you to show your methods". The thing is, Mann's a professor at a big name university. Is the school complicit in the fraud, too? Or partly responsible for it?
Two computer-coding friends of mine looked at what is purported to be the source code. They BOTH said - completely independently - that the code was designed to create the hockey stick effect.
DeleteMy own transition from alarmist to skeptic came when I saw the efforts to which they went to conceal their data gathering and analysis methods, as well as their analytical methods. The icing on the cake was when I learned they deliberately worked to keep papers with opposite conclusions from being published.