Why should someone be afforded "extra" and redundant protection under the law because of their race, creed or color if we are all equal? The law of the land
should apply equally to everyone. I cannot think of a single instance where any "hate crime legislation" would ever be needed if a crime were committed against anyone. The way I see it, these laws are designed only to draw attention and awareness to minorities and gays who already are provided as much protection as anyone against assault, battery, murder, etc. as any other person in this country. Why are such laws needed? Why does this country need "anti-lynching" legislation. The fact is if anyone goes so far as to put a noose around another Americans neck and hoist them into the air, they are either seriously demented, seeking vigilante justice, or by-God they hate the person's guts and liver that they are hanging! When I see "stuff" such as these photos below, it really makes me question the motives behind the sponsorship of such legislation. I hope Kamala, Maxine, and Valerie enjoyed their association with Jussie Smollett. He has proven himself to be real loser and liberal shit-stirrer. I know the liberal commiecrat media will only lightly report on this if at all, but let us try to make everyone we possibly can aware of how shady all these characters really are. I can already envision Chuck Schumer crying some too.
If you have the guts to visit a real liberal-POS "news site" that touts this anti-lynching bullshit , click HERE
H/T to Bob in KY for the images.
IMO Smollett's hoax was to stir up more racial tension. I think that would fall under a hate crime laws.
ReplyDeleteIf the law was applied evenly, it would be a hate crime law. Thanks for stopping by Tony.
DeleteIrish, in your "innocence" you _may_ be missing something here. Did you notice these are all older women? Older women - especially ones that find it difficult to establish a relationship with anything that doesn't require batteries - truly _love_ younger men, even ones who don't swing their way (although he could be "bi"). Perhaps his participation in some soap opera (I don't watch tv, so excuse me if it isn't a soap opera) adds a little more spice to the pot. What liberal witch doesn't like to stand next to a Hollywood actor they find attractive? Besides, maybe he can lick his eyebrows. I wonder how many vibrators have been named "Jussie" (is that pronounced "juicy" or "jussy", with a "J" instead of a "P"?)
ReplyDeleteThank the queers. This is their doing.
ReplyDeleteJuicy Smollett does identify as a gay man. I am not sure about his accomplices in this conspiracy, but I wouldn't be surprised if they don't turn out to be Sodomites too.
DeleteAll crimes are hate crimes. Speed through a redlight, you hate traffic laws. Enter a country without passing through a security checkpoint, you hate immigration laws.
ReplyDeletePosting anything on Twitter is a potential hate crime that may send you to #TwitterGulag for eternal damnation.
Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer are both hate crimes.
Why is killing a minority worse than killing a cab driver or liquor store clerk? The answer is it’s murder. Period. Enforce existing law.
ReplyDelete"hate crimes" are designed just for whites. it's extra crimes added on to make up for slavery. it is completely unconstitutional but if white people don't fight back this is what happens. so much for that milk equality bullshit.
ReplyDeleteSo...this means all those young feral lads engaging in 'The Knockout Game' aren't gonna get prosecuted?
ReplyDeleteSarc
The thought police at work. Kinda Orwellian ain't it.
ReplyDelete