Yet another claim: "GANG RAPE" / This is getting out of hand and morphing into the childhood story "The Little Boy Who Cried Wolf"
In this latest Kavanaugh episode of "who hit John" Julie Swetnick has come forward to announce that she was drugged and gang raped by a "train" of boys. Although she is not saying that Kavanaugh raped her she is stating that she Brett Kavanaugh waiting his turn in line at multiple parties where these gang rapes took place. This all gets more bizarre and illustrates just how low the demorat's carnival barkers, Mark Cohen and Michael Avenatti, will go in their attempts to keep Brett Kavanaugh from being appointed to the SCOTUS and damage Trump's image. In light of these (and other) recent allegations there are questions I keep asking myself that obviously the Marxist media is intentionally ignoring. One is, if Julie Swetnick was raped and drugged at a party as she states, then why would she continue to go back to similar parties where many of the same people were present knowing she might be drugged and raped as according to her "many girls were having trains ran on them by these young boys". With statements such as these I have to ask myself if it these gang rapes took place as she has explained and if she continued to go back over and over, was it gang-bangs or orgies? Why would one wait so long to report this? If she knew girls at other parties during the same time frame of 1982 were being raped and she was not impaired, why didn't she call the authorities and attempt to stop this. Why would she only tell her husband and three close friends years later? I smell ratshit. Their stories are constantly changing. I have doubts that anything is as Swetnick or Ford has claimed. There simply isn't any legal proof and they both have killed their credibility by being biased liberals who hate all conservatives and with their inconsistent stories.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/4chan-prankster-claims-punked-michael-avenatti-with-hoax-kavanaugh-train-gang-rape-accusation/
ReplyDeleteThanks Anon, but I'm not convinced this isn't a double cross-double cross or counter misinformation, etc. If the Reds did truly swallow this story hook, line, and sinker, it only proves they are unreliable and completely lack legitimacy. If the Gatewaypundit story proves to be true, I may take down or revise this post.
DeleteI agree to some extent, it could be a pre-emptive move to sow the seeds of doubt prior to the release. I believe nothing I see until it has been conclusively proven...however the original chan thread was posted Tuesday, 11am (yesterday). Avenetti's story is hitting the news cycle today using the same terminology as detailed 24 hours in advance in the chan post (train). I would, however, expect the 4chan post to include mention of the sworn statement that was presented and it doesn't (unless that was the CNN exclusive doc that is referred to) which knocks its credibility for sure.
DeleteThe autists got the world to believe the OK sign is a WP symbol, it's now mainstream. They got CNN to broadcast Sam Hyde was the Texas church shooter on the air LOL(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6RNaYwNEuw&feature=youtu.be), and more.
I don't find this one too terribly difficult to believe. The OP on 4chan claims to have recordings. I guess, like with everything else, we'll just have to wait and see.
The only thing I am sure of anymore is that I am getting tired of all this frikken waiting...
If your bitterness with the outcome of an election incites you to libel people and attempt to destroy institutions because you didn't get the result you wanted in the last political contest, such as is going on right now with Brett Kavanaugh, you are also inciting a shooting war. And let's be clear; while there were plenty of people on the right who didn't like Kagan or Sotomayer, and still don't (I'm among them) my issues with them, along with others on the right, begin and end with their refusal to adhere to the boundaries of the written Constitution. That I didn't like the way they might rule on this issue or that for this reason did not give me license to accuse either or both of them of felony sexual assault for political purposes and to sandbag alleged misdemeanor claims for the nakedly-explicit purpose of trying to delay a vote until after the next election takes place rather than to address an actual grievance.
ReplyDeleteMore here https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=234249
Well said Wes. Thanks for the link.
DeleteRush was saying today that this woman was "18-19yo college student, attending High School parties, where underaged (minor) youths were drinking, and having gang bangs with doped up girls 1982. That she admitted to attending 10 of these parties, until she was gangraped too; but never reported any of this to the local cops." Was she a participant of the underaged girls being raped, or just a casual observer at 18-19yo? EITHER WAY, my read is that: She is an accessory to a crime spree of pedophilia, statutory rape, contributing to the delinquency of minors, providing a controlled substance (alcoholic beverages) to minors etc.. The local law enforcement hasn't talked with her yet? WOW! Here is an eyewitness/participant in a string of illegal activities from the Departments COLD CASE FILES. Now she is reporting these crimes to sully a GOOD MAN's reputation and character, at the SENATE "JUDICIAL" Committee? THE FRIGGIN DEMS ARE APPLODING HER, AND DEMANDING THAT KAVANAUGH WITHDRAW? ARE YOU SCHITTING ME? What WORLD ARE THEY FROM? WHERE THE HELL IS THE RULE OF LAW, ANY LAW? RUSH said that it doesn't pass the muster, the smell test, of being true. So then it is ANOTHER false accusation in front of THE SENATE JUDICIARY HEARING AND NO ONE IS GOING TO JAIL? VERT DA FURK OVER!!!
ReplyDeleteGreat points Gleason Long. It is all smoke and mirrors.
DeleteMaking a false accusation should be punishable with the same punishment the person you falsly accused would or did get.
ReplyDeleteExile1981
She went back to these "parties" at least 10 times by her own admission. That tells me they weren't "gang rapes" but rather orgys and she was a willing participant. Besides, you would think that at least one of the girls being "raped" would have eventually called the police.
ReplyDelete"Gee I was 'raped' by one guy after another but I hear there to going to be another 'party" friday night. I cant wait to go."
Does anyone believe this bullshit other than media hacks. Hell, even Slimeswine and Upchuck dont believe it.
Uhhh... I think that would be "The Little GIRL Who Cried Wolf..."
ReplyDeleteIndeed!
DeleteMe thinks that still makes her another LIBERAL SKANKY HO, HO, HO. She probably supports Planned Parenthood, and those needledick asshats over @ GOOGLE. Commie slime all.
DeleteAvenatti wants to run for the brass ring and this is his resume.
ReplyDeleteI suggest he go back to Chiraq while he is still free.
this whole crap will blow up in the LEFT's face and will cost them so many votes in Nov.
ReplyDeleteI concur Rob and that is my fervent prayer.
DeleteThere has since been a 5th accuser who has since rescinded.
ReplyDeleteSo what are the Demos whining? the GOP is “now releasing anonymous allegations in an effort to make all allegations look frivolous.
Their lips to God's ears.
At this point, it is hard to say edutcher.
ReplyDeleteIt simply defies logic to think that a bunch of high school students could run a rape gang for two years with dozens of victims and everyone involved would remain silent for over three and a half decades. Especially given the fact that this is not the first time Kavanaugh's name has been in the news.
ReplyDeleteInteresting - if nothing else, the realization that "both sides" are playing this for all it is worth makes me want to look under rocks to see what's largely being hidden. Magicians one and all use deflection as their tool of the trade - "Two Men Tell Judiciary Committee They Did It, Not Kavanaugh" https://pjmedia.com/trending/bombshell-man-tells-judiciary-committee-he-did-it-not-kavanaugh/
ReplyDeleteForget the police No parent ever went to the girls the next day and asked about the blood in the bed. A rape with multiple males involved is going to injure the girl period end of story. Yet NO girl has come forward except this one who BTW is a Psycho (Politico has the article). 10 times this supposedly happened NOT one individual reported anything to a parent, doctor or law enforcement. She either liked it and liked watching other women be abused and or she procured the girls for the boys. Now she sees the money tree and Avenatti told her she could cash in.
ReplyDeleteHere's a little thought from William Jacobson of Legal Insurrection
ReplyDeleteI think Ford has convinced herself she experienced what she experienced, but the need to inject psychological terminology makes me conclude that it is a memory that, while believed, is not necessarily the way the rest of us remember things
Jacobson is critical of the lawyer Grassley hired because she isn't going for the throat. Again, we're talking politics, not trial. The smart thing may be to let Dr I Can't Remember hang herself, which she's done on several points, than do the Judgment At Nuremburg routine.
If you believe the Puffington poll, a lot of women don't buy her story. Having seen her play the ditzy Blanche DuBois bit, I think that may be reinforced.
If the Honorables get the idea the public isn't buying it, Brother Bret's on the Court.
PS I looked at Team Jacobson because I figured their view would be as level-headed as possible.
YMMV