Sunday, August 4, 2019

Never Forget: If Guns Are Outlawed, Only Outlaws Will Have Guns

It is nauseating to watch the talking heads on the Sunday morning talk shows bloviating about "gun limits" (that is a new term for me), etc. Then we have the local law enforcement holding press conferences and talking about how they will seek additional charges against the El Paso shooter for "committing a terrorist act", "hate crimes", etc.  So, I refrain from watching. Really? At this point was does piling on additional made-up political buzz phrase charges to bear on a person who has just committed twenty counts of murder in the first degree?  Already, Beto, Cumo, and a host of other politicos and liberal talking heads are spewing bullshit from their mouths promoting their anti-gun agenda while waiting for their chance to join in the "blood dance". By tomorrow night there is no telling what these stories will be spun into.  We still haven't heard from the Hollyweird crowd, but we will. No matter what is told or what one may see on the television set, one thing is certain. Without the right to keep and bear arms Americans will not be free.  Audemus jura nostra defendere


                                                                           image.jpeg

14 comments:

Bill589 said...

I love to watch old ‘westerns’ where nearly everybody was armed. If some evil idiots tried this ‘mass shooting’ back in the old west – which they would have to be extra, extra idiotic to do - in seconds the evil idiots would be the only ones looking like Swiss cheese.

skybill said...

Hi Irish,
"10-4!!!!!!!!!"
skybill

Anonymous said...

I no longer give a fuck what "they" think of my natural rights. At this point, they're merely reactive targets. No amount of "compromise" will ever satiate their lust for power and control so let's stop pretending and get on with what's comin. We ain't stopping it without defending ourselves and fuck anybody who wants to strip me of the ability to do so.

Phil said...

Only Outlaws will have guns.

Lot's and lots of guns.
Hundreds of millions of guns.
Molon Labe.
Let the first idiot step up to the plate and try to take them.

Anonymous said...

if you try to take Citizens guns away you are an Oath Breaker.

rgranger said...

The failure of a Government is always blamed on not enough Government. There are not enough laws against murder or assault, now we need more laws. How about you make it easier for us to defend ourselves...wait, that would not expand government.

Jeffery in Alabama said...

I haven't watched much of the circus today on the tube, but when I did it was more blah, blah, blah, charging Crusias with "domestic terrorism" and "hate crime laws". What is the point. He supposedly shot nigh on fifty people and killed twenty of those. Is murder in the first degree not enough? Hate crime legislation needs to be repealed. A life is life and someone's ethnicity, religion, or sexual orientation should not grant "special rights". Then the spokespersons for various agencies begin to talk about their "counter terrorism" task force, unit, team, department, etc. What happened is horrible for whatever reason is behind it, but if one doesn't believe .gov is out of control and running wild, one needs to remove their head from their ass. Watch a few news clips and look at all of the "assets" in the Wal Mart parking lot. I bet the total costs for just what I saw was well into the millions. Is it just me or was anyone shocked at how calm the police were when they took this guy into custody? Also, keep in mind this is after the calls go out that the shooter is armed with an "assault rifle" and has shot roughly fifty people. There is something very wrong with that picture.

Phil said...

There are a whole lot of inconsistencies in their narrative. This was a false flag in a big way. Expect more. The Deep State in a panic right now.

Jeffery in Alabama said...

I believe the DS is panicked and desperate too. If you haven't seen the front page of the NY Post, take a look at it. Disarming the American populace is the goal.
https://nypost.com/2019/08/04/the-post-says-ban-assault-weapons-now/

Phil said...

Am armed society is a polite society.
Stupid people can't figure this out...
How many of these false flags would happen if the shooters knew the odds of one or more of their intended victims having the capability to shoot back neared 75% to 80%?
Feeling lucky punk?

Anonymous said...

Bumpstock ban sure prevented these events.....right?

Anonymous said...

The Progressive Center Left(democrats) agenda doesn't care about saving lives are stopping criminals, it is to DISARM the Citizenry of the USA for evil reasons, do you want to find out the hard way???

Reg T said...

I think it is a clever attempt to separate Trump from a big part of his base - we in the Second Amendment crowd. Now even before the serious campaigning for 2020, they force Trump to react, to declare restrictions that will anger those single-issue folks who will not vote for anyone who violates their right to arm and defend themselves, loved ones, friends, and innocents caught in the cross-fire (or aimed for by these sick SOBs). I remember how I felt when Bush II proved he wasn't a 2A supporter, and how I decided not to vote for him (or anyone, that time around).

It would SUCK if the progressives behind these shootings are successful in getting 2A supporters and conservatives in general to not vote for Trump, just because he throws some kind of bone to the Left (like bump-fire stocks). He _has_ to do it, because the Left will all shout that he doesn't care who is killed, if he refuses to make some kind of gesture. I'm sure that is how his advisors will push on this issue. We are going to have to hold our noses on this one, I believe.

Think about it for a minute. If he restricts guns in some fashion but is still elected, he can refuse any further restrictions since he will no longer need to do so. If any of the whack jobs running as Democrats (actually hard-line communists) are elected, we will likely be facing a total gun ban, either all at once or piece-meal. Which would you truly rather to have happen? Who would you truly want to win the 2020 election? And this is one election that won't be the "lesser of two evils", because the difference between life under Trump as opposed to life under Harris, Sanders, Warren, Buttcrack, or Master Beto will be greater than in just about any time since our country began. Life under a non-politician President as opposed to continuing to elect politicians. If we can keep politicians out of the White House, we just might get this whole thing turned back around.

Reg T said...

Don't let your anger at Trump for the bump-stock ban, or whatever he may feel he has to do about these shootings, mean that you won't vote for him. Consider what life would be like with a total ban and confiscation under one of the whack jobs running, let alone Michel Obama (Michel being the male form of the name Michelle).

And when you tell yourself we will all rise up in righteous fury before giving in, think about how many true 2A supporters will fight if it means the possible death of their spouse, their children, or simply their family's life without their husband and father there to support and guide them. It might fall to mostly old cripples like me to fight it, which is saying it could be a lost cause. We old folks will fight - few years left so not much to lose - but it won't be enough, if it comes to that.