The condescending arrogance of the left never ceases to amaze me.
I have a friend who is fond of saying the definition of a liberal (commie, leftist, progressive, or some other lower than snakeshit left leaning opiniated being) is "someone who thinks they know what is best for YOU better than you know your own self". Below is a prime example of an overlord wannabe who has spent the last 47 years feeding at the government trough. Crazy-creepy-sleepy Joe believes voters "do not deserve to know" his stance on "packing" The Supreme Court. Of course by him saying "you'll find out after the election" is just an admission that should he win, he will definitely attempt to "pack the court".
Want to the left's heads Explode at the end of the last debate. The president should say you packing the supreme court sounds like a really good idea I think an additional 12 Justices would be just about the right number to add before the election. I will ask the majority leader to waive senate rules and vote on the current nominee and an addition 12 candidates for a revamped supreme court. Boom Progressive heads explode all over the media.
Jeffry - I hate to correct you, but when you feed the pigs, it is called slopping at the trough. there is a lot of slopping going on in the District of Corruption.
Recall what House Speaker Nanny "Let Them Eat Gourmet Ice Cream" Pelosi said about Obamacare: "We have to pass the bill so we know what's in the bill."
What Biden is also implying is that he will only represent those people who vote for him. He is signalling the Democrats' intention to go fully Third World in their style of governance.
What Biden is also implying is that he will only represent those people who vote for him. He is signalling the Democrats' intention to go fully Third World in their style of governance.
Okay so FDR wanted to do this but nothing moved toward making it happen but, SCOTUS rulings changed a bit indicating to me that the seated Justices saw the adding of more justices as a threat. What I don't know is whether it was a power threat or a monetary one or maybe a bit of both. Supposedly, there is an investigation on the present Justices free travel and the like. They do give speeches and the like similar to Ex-Presidents
Okay so FDR wanted to do this but nothing moved toward making it happen but, SCOTUS rulings changed a bit indicating to me that the seated Justices saw the adding of more justices as a threat. What I don't know is whether it was a power threat or a monetary one or maybe a bit of both. Supposedly, there is an investigation on the present Justices free travel and the like. They do give speeches and the like similar to Ex-Presidents
I just don't understand how one branch of our government can rule over another branch in a way that increases their manning for obvious political gain. Can the Executive branch also decrease the Judicial branch numbers if they see fit? Does this mean the Judicial branch can decrease the Legislative branch manning if they want? When does it stop? I thought the top levels of the USG were all independent of each other. -tarheel
Want to the left's heads Explode at the end of the last debate. The president should say you packing the supreme court sounds like a really good idea I think an additional 12 Justices would be just about the right number to add before the election. I will ask the majority leader to waive senate rules and vote on the current nominee and an addition 12 candidates for a revamped supreme court. Boom Progressive heads explode all over the media.
ReplyDeleteTotally, Totally Agree!
DeleteThis is a totally awesome idea pass the popcorn.
DeleteI just can't bring myself to vote for a pervert and a prostitute.
ReplyDeleteJeffry - I hate to correct you, but when you feed the pigs, it is called slopping at the trough. there is a lot of slopping going on in the District of Corruption.
ReplyDeleteTheir wickedness knows no bounds.
ReplyDeleteRecall what House Speaker Nanny "Let Them Eat Gourmet Ice Cream" Pelosi said about Obamacare: "We have to pass the bill so we know what's in the bill."
ReplyDeleteI am astounded that no one has noticed, after all these years, that this is the very definition of a stool sample.
DeleteHumans never fail to disappoint...
What Biden is also implying is that he will only represent those people who vote for him. He is signalling the Democrats' intention to go fully Third World in their style of governance.
ReplyDeleteWhat Biden is also implying is that he will only represent those people who vote for him. He is signalling the Democrats' intention to go fully Third World in their style of governance.
ReplyDeleteOkay so FDR wanted to do this but nothing moved toward making it happen but, SCOTUS rulings changed a bit indicating to me that the seated Justices saw the adding of more justices as a threat. What I don't know is whether it was a power threat or a monetary one or maybe a bit of both. Supposedly, there is an investigation on the present Justices free travel and the like. They do give speeches and the like similar to Ex-Presidents
ReplyDeleteOkay so FDR wanted to do this but nothing moved toward making it happen but, SCOTUS rulings changed a bit indicating to me that the seated Justices saw the adding of more justices as a threat. What I don't know is whether it was a power threat or a monetary one or maybe a bit of both. Supposedly, there is an investigation on the present Justices free travel and the like. They do give speeches and the like similar to Ex-Presidents
ReplyDeleteI just don't understand how one branch of our government can rule over another branch in a way that increases their manning for obvious political gain. Can the Executive branch also decrease the Judicial branch numbers if they see fit? Does this mean the Judicial branch can decrease the Legislative branch manning if they want? When does it stop? I thought the top levels of the USG were all independent of each other.
ReplyDelete-tarheel