The democrats strike again, and again with no consequences for their actions. it was the democrat killing machine that pulled the trigger in texas and ohio. think about it for a moment. how many mass murdering republicans ended up being rabid democrats in the end? All of them. when do we get to have a common sense democrat limitations discussion which would put most of them into a mental ward for their own safety and label it a safe space that is gun free..
Sense of events blog has a couple of lengthy articles about mass shootings; take away is that they will usually occur in clusters as news media coverage of the first lowers the threshold for those committing subsequent attacks. So ,theorizing here, tptb only need to initiate one (Gilroy) to leverage at least one more over a couple of weeks and gain plenty of media distraction from their own troubles. Cynical? Yes. Improbable? No.
Hi Irish,
ReplyDelete"Funny thing you should Mention That!!?????"
skybill
Isn't it ironic. not 1 but 2 mass shootings. good call
ReplyDeleteOne mass shooting apparently doesn't go as far as it used to, hence the two.
ReplyDeleteYep, pretty much true...
ReplyDeleteThe democrats strike again, and again with no consequences for their actions. it was the democrat killing machine that pulled the trigger in texas and ohio. think about it for a moment. how many mass murdering republicans ended up being rabid democrats in the end? All of them. when do we get to have a common sense democrat limitations discussion which would put most of them into a mental ward for their own safety and label it a safe space that is gun free..
ReplyDeleteSense of events blog has a couple of lengthy articles about mass shootings; take away is that they will usually occur in clusters as news media coverage of the first lowers the threshold for those committing subsequent attacks. So ,theorizing here, tptb only need to initiate one (Gilroy) to leverage at least one more over a couple of weeks and gain plenty of media distraction from their own troubles. Cynical? Yes. Improbable? No.
ReplyDelete